Change Detection
Satellite imagesRemote sensing can be used to monitor (via a time
series of images ) and manage World Heritage sites. For an overview
see Remote Sensing and other
associated links. Some specific applications of remote sensing in
land cover and land use analysis within the Virunga National Park
are illustrated by two Landsat images taken in 1987 and in 2001.
The knowledge of the changes in time of the vegetation status and
its dynamics allows to take the appropriate management
options regarding the habitat of certain species. The changes can
include vegetation disappearance, vegetation degradation,
replacement of forests by agriculture, regrowth of certain vegetation
types.
Image analysis and interpretation involves initially checking the
grey-scale (black and white) image of each individual channel (band)
to obtain a sense of the spectral characteristics of each type of
land cover features in every single band. In the second step, false
colour composites are obtained by assigning Red, Green or Blue colour
to one of the three component bands (given in the order of RGB).
Image enhancement procedures are applied to the images to improve
their appearance.
Image Analysis
The images below show a border region of the Virunga National Park,
situated near Rutshuru. The left satellite image was taken in 1987
in the dry season (Landsat 5 TM), and the right satellite image
was taken in 2001 during the rainy season (Landsat
7 ETM+). Visual interpretation of the 1987 figure shows the following
land cover features. The dark twisting line in the image is the
Rutshuru River. The dark sickle-shaped black spot is a volcanic
lake. Notice the tonal differences between dense forest (dark red-brown)
in circle on right and the sparse or secondary vegetation (light
brown) above the river in the centre of the image. The predominant
savannas are represented by the darker shade of blue in the bottom
centre of the image. Bare soil is characterised by light blue to
the left of the lake.
 |
 |
| Landsat Image (1987) |
Landsat Image (2001) |
Comparisons of the two images in the upper left
corner show that, in the 2001 image (rainy season) almost
all of the dense vegetation (reddish-brown colour) had
disappeared. This means that the vegetation on
the right side of the river had almost disappeared over the 14-year
period. The upper section of the river forms the natural border
of the park, so this remarkable vegetation transition occurred outside
the park, up to the border edge. The right circle situated outside
the park, also experienced loss of vegetation between 1987 and 2001.
Generally, we notice more dense vegetation (dark red-brown) in
the 2001 picture compared to 1987. The reason is not because of
a vegetation increase from 1987 to 2001, but is due to seasonal
changes, with the 2001 image taken in the rainy season. For the
same reason, we see that the fields which become bright orange in
the 2001 image where bare land in the1987 image (circle under the
lake).
Image Classifications
Supervised classification is a method that “trains”
the computer to recognize the spectral signature of each image pixel
as belonging to one of a number of learned signatures. Training
sites are developed by locating (in video) pixels, which are examples
of each land cover that is to be classified based on the interpreters’
knowledge of the scene. Here are some classification results of
the 1987 (on the left) and 2001 (on the right) images using the
following classes:
- dense forest (green)
- sparse/secondary vegetation (yellow)
- savannas (light brown)
- croplands/regrowth (dark pink - 2001)
- bare soil (beige)
- water (blue)
 |
 |
| Classification 1987 |
Classification 2001 |
When we compare the two images, we notice the replacement of dense
vegetation (green) by savannas or secondary vegetation in 2001.
This process known as bush encroachment is common
were the primary forests have been cut down. We can also clearly
see areas overtaken by deforestation or sparse vegetation after
the 14-year period.
This vegetation transition is more clearly seen
in the change analysis image.

Change of dense vegetation
In 2001, all dense vegetation loss is shown in red. The seasonal
differences are noticeable through the replacement of bare
soil (beige) by cropland and by savannas, and in few cases by dense
vegetation.
|